06.24.2015 Two ways of looking at things

As I walked along the Middle Branch of the Swift River which flows into the Quabbin Reservoir I was looking for cascades like the one I posted yesterday.  But the first thing I noticed was the edge across from me with a dead and broken tree and a lot of green around it.  My first impulse was a portrait mode image, but the fallen branch attracted as well so I flipped the camera.  Which do you think works better…assuming you think either works.  🙂

River's-Edge-1-Middle-Branch-of-the-Swift-River-062215-700Web

River's-Edge-2-Middle-Branch-of-the-Swift-River-062215-700WebThe trunk closer to us was leaning across the river and wedged into the tree I was standing under.  The lower fern fronds were hanging into the water so are not out of focus but in constant motion.

Advertisements

About Steve Gingold

I am a Nature Photographer with interests in all things related. Water, flowers, insects and fungi are my main interests but I am happy to photograph wildlife and landscapes and all other of Nature's subjects.
This entry was posted in Intimate Landscape, Landscape, Nature Photography, Quabbin, Western Massachusetts and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to 06.24.2015 Two ways of looking at things

  1. My first impulse was that I preferred the portrait style. But I looked at them again after reducing their screen size. The landscape view shows the terrain better, the slope to the left, the balance of colors and textures.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. shoreacres says:

    The green is luscious. The scene reminds me a bit of the frog you posted: it’s the combination of wet and green that links them. We’re hot enough now that a glade like this is deeply appealing.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Jim in IA says:

    I like the landscape mode. It gives me more information about the scene as Melanie described above.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I prefer the first photo. Just seems more personal and I can see the ferns better. This is a very appealing photo- green and serene.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Gail P. says:

    I like the landscape mode better.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. krikitarts says:

    The landscape format draws me into the image more than the portrait one. I’d like to see another with maybe twice as much water (or a bit more) in the lower edge. But I’m always drawn to moving water. There’s a genus of caddis flies called Hydropsyche, with which I feel a great affinity.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Actually there is one more image from the time here with more water that will show up here shortly, Gary. As much as I enjoy insects, I have to admit to a lack of affinity with them. Frogs….they’re more my type. 🙂

      Like

  7. Love the lush greens; such a wonderful image, such a wonderful reminder of the special world we inhabit.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. quabbinite says:

    I’m siding with Portrait over Landscape. The Landscape photo is overwhelmed with vegetation, causing an oversaturation of green. The Portrait photo has the very attractive water blur and a variety of other colors from the trunk and the vegetation as well. If the fallen limb had more character to its position or appearance, the decision would have been more difficult.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Andrew says:

    I vote for portrait mode. Or maybe landscape. Can I have both?

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Same here…but I think I like the landscape better. Yes, I think so. It made me say, “OH!” to myself. Good thing nobody can hear me 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s